Reconstruction of Leonardo’s fingerprint gave some clues about his possible ethnicity, according to controversial Italian research. Dermatoglyphics, science that studies skin patterns through computer analysis of data, claims to have found connection between fingerprint patterns and population ethnicity.
So, based on reconstructed fingerprint of Leonardo da Vinci, researchers made a conclusion that he was of Middle Eastern descent. “The fingerprint features patterns such as the central whorl that are dominant in the Middle East.
About 60 percent of the Middle Eastern population display the same dermatoglyphic structure,” according to the anthropologist Luigi Capasso. This gives new evidence to the theory of Alessandro Vezzosi that Leonardo’s mother was not a peasant from Vinci but a slave girl brought to Tuscany from Middle East.
This was quite wide-spread in Italy that slaves, brought from Middle East, Eastern Europe and Balkans, were used in wealthy homes to perform all kinds of duties. An existence of 550 slaves has been documented in Florence at the time of Leonardo’s birth. Alessandro Vezzosi, the director of Museo Ideale Leonardo Da Vinci in the artist’s home town of Vinci in Tuscany, discovered some papers showing that at the time of Leonardo’s birth his father was a craftsman, Ser Piero Da Vinci, and his mother was a female slave known as Caterina.
It was a common practice to baptize slave girls, giving them names like Maria, Caterina, and Marta. The only Caterina that was inside Ser Piero’s circle was a slave in the house of his wealthy friend Vanni di Niccolo di Ser Vanni, whose hand-written will was recently discovered in the archives. It looks like after his death Vanni left his house in Florence to Ser Piero and his slave Caterina to his late wife Agnola. It seems that logically the inheritance should have been switched between two of them. Ser Piero then negotiated freedom for Caterina in exchange for allowing Vanni’s widow Agnola stay in the house and did not take possession of the property until her death.
Caterina was quickly married off to Acchattabriga di Piero del Vaccha da Vinci, I’m guessing, against her will as his name in Italian means “quick to start a quarrel.” There are some theories and speculations that later in life, when Caterina was in her sixties, Leonardo stayed in touch with his mother and she even moved to Milan to be closer to her son. They are based on some encrypted clues found in da Vinci manuscripts called Codex Atlanticus and Codex Forster II. And then there is Mona Lisa that was often called Leonardo’s self-portrait as the features from the two line up eerily perfectly. It is the only painting that he carried with him all his life which wouldn’t be the case with a commissioned portrait.
Could it be the depiction of Caterina?
We probably would never know for sure. Though scientists claimed that they have collected some saliva and traces of food from manuscripts as Leonardo had a habit of eating late at night while working on his notes. So, what’s next? A complete DNA mapping or clones of Renaissance genius?